Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7722 14
Original file (NR7722 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
- DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 

HCG .
Docket No. NR7722-14
28 Jan 15

From: Chairmen, Board for Correction of Maval Records

To: Secretary of the Navy

Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico

Ref: (a) Title 10 U,8.c. 1552

Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments
(2} NPC memo 1430 Ser 812/0010 dtd 8 Jan 15
(3) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board
requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected
to modify Petitioner's advancement effective date and Time in Rate
(TIR} .

2. The Board, consisting of i

reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 January
2015 and, pursuant to its requlations, determined that the corrective
action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of
record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and
policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations
within the Department of the Navy. ©

b. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the office having
cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s
application has commented to the effect that the request has merit and
warrants favorable action.

CONCLUSION

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of the contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds
the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective
action.
Docket No. NR7722-14
RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to
show that:

: ener is advanced to MT2 cffective 16 Ju S22
Time-In-Rate of 1 January 2013. Note: Petitioner's eycle 219
Navy Wide Examination (NWAE) was graded against cycle 216, and made

the minimum multiple required.

4
+
f

b. A copy of this Report of Proceedings will be filed in
Petitioner's naval record.

4. It is certified that quorum was present at the Board's review and -
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of
the Board's proceedings in the above entit ed .

yh

CASH

  

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference
(a}, has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the

Navy.
28 Jan 15

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6980 14

    Original file (NR6980 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR6980-14 28 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD ICO Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval-record be corrected to authorize advancement to a higher grade. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and especially in light of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6960 14

    Original file (NR6960 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S&. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a) Subject, hereinafter ~ referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to advance Petitioner to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR12882 14

    Original file (NR12882 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    NR12882-14 6 Jan 15 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ico Ref: (a) Title 10 u.s.c. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Petitioner was advanced under the provisions of Naval 2. NR12882-14 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 00339-07

    Original file (00339-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geisler, George, and Wade, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 30 January 2007 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08235-01

    Original file (08235-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Frankfurt and Schultz and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 February 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command office having cognizance over Navy enlisted advancement matters has commented to the effect that Petitioner’s request has merit and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6293 14

    Original file (NR6293 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be ecrrected to show correct date of rank (DOR). The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 28 January 2015 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08181-07

    Original file (08181-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Exinicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR8481 14

    Original file (NR8481 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure {1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advancement to a higher grade. The Board, consisting of reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 March 2014 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. CONCLUSION Upon...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07557-07

    Original file (07557-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced when first eligible.2. The Board, consisting of Exinicios, George, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 January 2008 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 06207-09

    Original file (06207-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 Enel: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo 1430 Ser 811/005 of 4 Jan 2010 {3) Subject’s naval record 1, Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner was advanced to E-6/AWR1 from the September 2008 Navy-wide Reserve advancement exam. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Zsalman, and George reviewed...